Page 2 of 2

Re: The work of our GIANTS - How often do we have to evidence the same results? What matters the most now?

Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 2:15 pm
by Debbie_Hepplewhite
Professors James Chapman and Bill Tunmer have worked very hard for years on analysing the results and realities of the Reading Recovery intervention programme - and their contribution is exceptionally important for laying bare the truth of the whole language approach on already weak readers:

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1054
We conclude that RR does not tailor instruction to meet the needs of individual students, as claimed. The RR instructional model, developed in the 1970s, fails to recognise the importance of explicit, systematic instruction in phonemic awareness and the use of letter–sound relations. Such instruction is essential for most students who struggle with literacy learning during their early years of schooling and especially important for students who experience the most difficulty with learning to read. Suggestions are presented for strengthening the RR programme and for reducing the number of unrecovered students.

UPDATE: Dr Michael Johnston acknowledges the work of James Chapman in this article, August 2023:
IN PRAISE OF A KIWI ICONOCLAST
https://www.nzinitiative.org.nz/reports ... conoclast/
James Chapman has led the fight to ditch Reading Recovery and adopt structured literacy for decades. Finally, late in his career, it looks as if victory is in the air. Ministry funding is now available to train teachers in structured literacy.

Professor Chapman may not be an idol like Dame Marie. In fact, when it comes to Reading Recovery, he’s an iconoclast. But he has science on his side, and a steely determination to do what’s best for our kids.
James in a founding committee member for the International Foundation for Effective Reading Instruction, see here:

https://iferi.org/team-members-profile/ ... ew-Zealand

For James's review of the re-branded Reading Recovery programme (July 2023), follow this link:

viewtopic.php?p=3127#p3127

Re: The work of our GIANTS - How often do we have to evidence the same results? What matters the most now?

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 12:22 am
by Debbie_Hepplewhite
Member of the founding committee of the International Foundation for Effective Reading Instruction, Sir Jim Rose, is world-renowned for his work to promote evidence-informed systematic synthetic phonics - drawing on both research findings and leading-edge classroom practice:

About Sir Jim Rose:

https://iferi.org/members/sir-jim-rose- ... a/#more-51

Sir Jim Rose's famous report commissioned by the, then, UK Government in 2005/6 was a turning point in England to the official acceptance of the Simple View of Reading model (Gough and Tunmer, 1986) replacing the 'Searchlights' multi-cueing strategies (National Literacy Strategy, 1998) for teachers' professional understanding of what it means to be a reader in the full sense. Despite many phonics critics and detractors, England has gone from strength to strength in accepting and embracing the need for systematic synthetic phonics provision in early years and infant schools.

See Sir Jim Rose's Final Report (2006) via this page:

https://iferi.org/evidence/

Sir Jim Rose continues to support the need for systematic synthetic phonics in our schools and writes articles periodically on the topic of literacy, for example - see the topics of IFERI's blog to view several articles by Sir Jim:

https://iferi.org/blog/

I am heartbroken to update this tribute to the work of the wonderful Sir Jim Rose with news of his death. I knew Jim personally and describe him as the most gentlemanly of all gentlemen. I mention his world-renowned contribution to literacy in all my talks, training events and PowerPoints - and will continue to do so.

See here for information about Jim - his work and his life - reflecting how highly he was regarded by family, friends, associates and the wider world:

https://rrf.org.uk/messageforum/viewtopic.php?t=6622

Re: The work of our GIANTS - How often do we have to evidence the same results? What matters the most now?

Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:31 am
by Debbie_Hepplewhite
Here are some historical facts about a great lady and great contributor to knowledge and understanding about reading instruction, Geraldine Rodgers:

https://infogalactic.com/info/Geraldine_Rodgers

Thanks to Elizabeth Brown who reminded us of Geraldine via her Tweet below:
Geraldine Rodgers wrote her first pro-phonics book after a sabbatical in 1979. She wrote her last phonics book year at age 92! Her history of reading instruction is an amazing work. Bio: https://infogalactic.com/info/Geraldine_Rodgers … Her history is now available as a PDF. http://donpotter.net/pdf/history.pdf

Re: The work of our GIANTS - How often do we have to evidence the same results? What matters the most now?

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:31 pm
by Debbie_Hepplewhite
A couple of 'contemporary' greats in Australia include Professor Pamela Snow - a prolific blogger and tweeter; and Dr Jennifer Buckingham.

This interview with Jennifer facilitated by Tom Bennett of researchED reveals some interesting background to Jen's journey. Our IFERI message forum has many threads featuring the important work of Jennifer in Australia:

https://researched.org.uk/screen-queen- ... uckingham/
Tom Bennett interviews Australian phonics champion Dr. Jennifer Buckingham.

Dr Jennifer Buckingham is the Director of Strategy and Senior Research Fellow at MultiLit, a literacy programme provider and research unit in Australia. A prominent figure on the Australian literacy stage, she previously spent two decades at the Centre for Independent Studies, most recently as Senior Research Fellow and founder of the FIVE from FIVE initiative. She has published numerous reports and articles on reading instruction and has provided advice to state and federal governments on literacy programmes and the introduction of a Year 1 Phonics Check. Jennifer is a board member of the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. Jennifer’s PhD was in the area of literacy and social disadvantage, supervised by Professor Kevin Wheldall and Dr Robyn Wheldall. I caught up with Jennifer at the Literacy, Language and Learning conference in Perth, Australia, in April 2019, where we talked about her career, phonics, and the political landscape of Australian education.

TB: Thanks for speaking to researchED magazine. How did you get started?
And here is a link to Pam's very popular, extremely well-written blog, The Snow Report:

http://pamelasnow.blogspot.com

Re: The work of our GIANTS - How often do we have to evidence the same results? What matters the most now?

Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2019 8:34 pm
by Debbie_Hepplewhite
Dr Linda Siegel is a founding committee member of the International Foundation for Effective Reading Instruction. Her lifelong contribution to an understanding of learning difficulties is exceptional:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linda_Siegel


Linda contributed a statement in light of the controversy of whether the term 'dyslexia' is helpful or not;

http://www.iferi.org/wp-content/uploads ... tement.pdf
Solving the Problems of Dyslexia (Reading Disability)

In their recent book, The Dyslexia Debate (Cambridge University Press, March, 2014), Julian G. Elliott and Elena L. Grigorenko have proposed that we abandon the term dyslexia because it has outlived its usefulness. They note many difficulties with the definition and use of the term. They outline the inequities in the manner in which the term is applied and the interventions and accommodations that are available. These points are very important ones and clearly worthy of consideration.

Re: The work of our GIANTS - How often do we have to evidence the same results? What matters the most now?

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 1:14 pm
by Debbie_Hepplewhite
I'm so conscious regarding this thread I started that there are many, many heroes who have promoted, and who do promote, research-informed reading instruction - and many who have conducted the research projects that have contributed to informing us - that are not included on this thread.

I'm so very sorry that they are not all listed here - but a visit to the 'Children of the Code' which is American-based leads to many such people and the Forum of the International Foundation for Effective Reading Instruction itself features many of the 'current' pioneers in various countries.

In the meantime, Faith Borkowsky (who is herself a notable pioneer so do follow her on Twitter), flagged up Don Potter. I agree with Faith that he is one of the 'unsung heroes' - do visit his content-rich and interesting site:
High Five Literacy @FaithBorkowsky
My friend, Don Potter, wrote this poem for me. Love it Smiling face with 3 hearts
@don07774637

Visit his website for lots of wonderful information on reading. He’s one of the unsung heroes in literary education. http://donpotter.net
http://donpotter.net

Re: The work of our GIANTS - How often do we have to evidence the same results? What matters the most now?

Posted: Fri May 14, 2021 9:36 am
by Debbie_Hepplewhite
This is a wonderful video interview of another of our GIANTS - Bill Tunmer - one of the originators of the Simple View of Reading model (Gough and Tunmer, 1986) - a model of understanding the two main processes of being a reader in the full sense that is the basis for the official guidance in England!

Please do watch - and note the names of other significant figures in the reading debate mentioned by Bill:


viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1416

Re: The work of our GIANTS - How often do we have to evidence the same results? What matters the most now?

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2021 5:24 pm
by Debbie_Hepplewhite
The thread, link below, is a heartfelt tribute to the work of Richard (Dick) Schutz - thanks to the contribution of Faith Borkowsky.

Another of our 'giants' who is gone, but not forgotten:

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1427&p=3018#p3018

Re: The work of our GIANTS - How often do we have to evidence the same results? What matters the most now?

Posted: Mon May 23, 2022 7:32 pm
by Debbie_Hepplewhite
A memorial tribute for the wonderful Professor Diane McGuinness who has influenced and supported so many of us in the quest for understanding, promoting and providing informed reading instruction:

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1447&p=3078#p3078