Canada: Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC) 'Right to Read' inquiry findings

News articles, interviews, research, events and lots more - ready for your comments.
Post Reply
User avatar
Debbie_Hepplewhite
Posts: 2498
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 4:42 pm

Canada: Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC) 'Right to Read' inquiry findings

Post by Debbie_Hepplewhite »

Congratulations to those involved with this important inquiry in Ontario, Canada - including Dr Linda Siegel, a founding committee member of the International Foundation for Effective Reading Instruction.

https://www.ohrc.on.ca/en/right-to-read ... ve-summary
Executive summary

Approved by the OHRC: January 27, 2022

WARNING: This summary deals with topics that may trigger some readers. It includes references to bullying, emotional and physical abuse, mental health challenges, self-harm and suicide. Please engage in self-care as you read this material. There are many resources available if you need additional support, including on the OHRC website at: http://www.ohrc.on.ca under List of supports.

Introduction

The right to equal education includes the right to read

On November 9, 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada released a unanimous decision recognizing that learning to read is not a privilege, but a basic and essential human right. The Supreme Court found that Jeffrey Moore, a British Columbia student with dyslexia, had a right to receive the intensive supports and interventions he needed to learn to read. The school board’s failure to provide special education programs and services, including intensive intervention, denied Jeffrey Moore meaningful access to education, resulting in discrimination under the British Columbia Human Rights Code. The Court said:

…adequate special education…is not a dispensable luxury. For those with severe learning disabilities, it is the ramp that provides access to the statutory commitment to education made to all children…

The Moore v British Columbia (Education) decision (Moore) confirmed that human rights laws in Canada protect the right of all students to an equal opportunity to learn to read. This decision was lauded as a significant victory for students with disabilities, particularly students with reading disabilities. Many hoped that it would act as a catalyst for systemic change in Ontario’s education system.

Almost 10 years after the Moore decision, the Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC) released a report on its public inquiry into the right to read. The right to read applies to ALL students, not just students with reading disabilities. This inquiry found that Ontario is not fulfilling its obligations to meet students’ right to read.

Despite decades of multi-disciplinary research on what is most effective for teaching students early reading skills, and after Moore affirmed that meaningful access to education, including learning to read, is a human right, Ontario is systematically failing students with reading disabilities and many other students. The promise of Moore has not been fulfilled. This leaves many students at risk for significant life-long difficulties. The inquiry is not just about an equal right to read – it is about an equal right to a future.
The science of reading

This report uses terms like the “science of reading,” “reading science,” “research-based,” “evidence-based” and “science-based” to refer to the vast body of scientific research that has studied how reading skills develop and how to ensure the highest degree of success in teaching all children to read. The science of reading includes results from thousands of peer-reviewed studies and meta-analyses that use rigorous scientific methods. The science of reading is based on expertise from many fields including education, special education, developmental psychology, educational psychology, cognitive science and more.

Focusing on early reading

Literacy goes beyond the ability to read and write proficiently. It includes the ability to access, take in, analyze and communicate information in a variety of formats, and interact with different forms of communication and technologies.

Word-reading and spelling are a foundation for being able to read and write and successfully interact with different forms of communication. Everyone wants and needs to be able to read words to function in school and life. The inquiry heard many accounts of people who could not read a menu in a restaurant, read ingredients on a food label, read street signs, play video games that involve reading, search the Internet, look at websites or access other forms of digital media.

Becoming fully literate also requires more than just the ability to read words. The ability to understand the words that are read and the sentences that contain them are important for strong reading comprehension. A comprehensive approach to early literacy recognizes that instruction that focuses on word-reading skills, oral language development, vocabulary and knowledge development, and writing are all important components of literacy.

The inquiry focused on word-level reading and the associated early reading skills that are a foundation for good reading comprehension. This focus was chosen because of the ongoing struggle for Ontario students to receive evidence-based instruction in these foundational skills; the difficulty in meeting early reading outcomes for many students, often from marginalized or Code-protected groups; research recognizing the importance of instruction in these foundational word-reading skills; and the recognition of the rights of students with dyslexia in the Moore decision.

Word-level reading difficulties are the most common challenge for students who struggle to learn to read well. Most students who have issues with reading comprehension have word-level reading difficulties.

Despite their importance, foundational word-reading skills have not been effectively targeted in Ontario’s education system. They have been largely overlooked in favour of an almost exclusive focus on contextual word-reading strategies and on socio-cultural perspectives on literacy. These are not substitutes for developing strong early word-reading skills in all students. The OHRC’s position is that making sure all children are taught the necessary skills to read words fluently and accurately furthers and does not detract from equity, anti-racism and anti-oppression.

Early word-reading skills are critical, but they are not the only necessary components in reading outcomes. Robust evidence-based phonics programs should be one part of broader, evidence-based, rich classroom language arts instruction, including but not limited to story telling, book reading, drama, and text analysis. Evidence-based direct, explicit instruction for spelling and writing are also important to literacy. Many students, including students with reading disabilities, have difficulties with written expression. Explicit, evidence-based instruction in building background and vocabulary knowledge, and in reading comprehension strategies, are all parts of comprehensive literacy instruction. Although the inquiry focused on one most frequent obstacle to students developing a strong foundation in early reading skills, the report also acknowledges the other elements of a comprehensive approach to literacy. These elements must also be addressed when implementing report recommendations.


About Dr Linda Siegel:

https://iferi.org/team-members-profile/ ... el:-Canada
User avatar
Debbie_Hepplewhite
Posts: 2498
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 4:42 pm

Re: Canada: Ontario Human Rights Commission 'Right to Read' inquiry findings

Post by Debbie_Hepplewhite »

I've cross-referenced this thread with the Research and Recommended Reading forum as it is a very important development:

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1437
Geoff Vaughan
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2019 8:03 am
Location: Hungary
Contact:

Re: Canada: Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC) 'Right to Read' inquiry findings

Post by Geoff Vaughan »

It is extremely welcome and encouraging to see and read this report. There has been a huge amount of work done to get change such as this recognised. I do hope this leads to real improvement and outcomes for all learners.
User avatar
Debbie_Hepplewhite
Posts: 2498
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 4:42 pm

Re: Canada: Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC) 'Right to Read' inquiry findings

Post by Debbie_Hepplewhite »

Here is the video footage streamed live on 28 Feb 2022 of the:


Right to Read inquiry report release

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_12Z3Lg8F-U
User avatar
Debbie_Hepplewhite
Posts: 2498
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 4:42 pm

Re: Canada: Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC) 'Right to Read' inquiry findings

Post by Debbie_Hepplewhite »

Here is a statement by Dr Linda Siegel responding to CBC's story covering the criticism of the Right to Read Report by Diane Collier purportedly representing a 'group of literacy professors':

Don’t Confuse Me with the Facts: The Truth about the Ontario Human Rights Commission Right to Read Report

The CBC published a story in which Diane Collier, claiming to represent a group of literacy professors, was critical of the Ontario Human Rights Commission Right to Read Report. She misrepresented the Report. It is time to set the record straight with the truth about the Report.

She claimed that the Report was “too narrow” in its approach to reading. She is wrong. As an example, on page 7 the Report notes, “A comprehensive approach to early literacy recognizes that instruction that focuses on word-reading skills, oral language development, vocabulary and knowledge development, and writing are all important components of literacy.” The Report recognized the variety of skills that are critical for developing reading.

She claimed that there was no research to support the beneficial effects of a phonics approach; "We don't have really any evidence that this works long-term, that this particular kind of approach makes better readers, makes better students and learners." She is wrong. The Report cites several studies, including several Canadian ones, of the excellent reading skills that children achieved with this approach (For example, page 169-170 of the Report)

Everyone concerned with education, including the detractors of the Report, should read the OHRC report. Support for the Report is pouring in from school administrators, teachers, parents, pediatricians, speech pathologists, and the academic community from Canada and around the world.



Linda Siegel

Professor Emerita, UBC

Author of Not Stupid, Not Lazy: Understanding Dyslexia and Other Learning Disabilities
User avatar
Debbie_Hepplewhite
Posts: 2498
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 4:42 pm

Re: Canada: Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC) 'Right to Read' inquiry findings

Post by Debbie_Hepplewhite »

Further criticism of the Right to Read report has appeared in the letter section of the Ottawa Citizen:
Today's letters: 'Right to read' inquiry recommendations miss the mark
https://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/today ... s-the-mark

Here is Dr Linda Siegel's response:
The Truth About the Right to Read Report

In a letter (March 15, 2022), Shelley Stagg Peterson was critical of the approach taken by the Right to Read Report of the Ontario Human Rights Commission. She mistakenly called their approach “blinkered.” She ignored the numerous discussions throughout the Report about the various processes involved in reading. Here is just one example from the Report, “A comprehensive approach to early literacy recognizes that instruction that focuses on word-reading skills, oral language development, vocabulary and knowledge development, and writing are all important components of literacy.”

She wrote, “Teaching phonics not the only answer.” The Report never said that it was the only answer and clearly stated that teaching phonological awareness and phonics is only one part of teaching reading.

She wrote, “Reading English is not phonetical; it is visual. If a child has a good visual memory, he or she will be able to read anything they can understand by the end of grade one." In the English language (and all other alphabetic languages) letters have sounds. In English, one can sound out 85-90% of words by knowing the sounds of the letters. English has over 170,000 words. Should we memorize all these words and not use the powerful tool of sounding them out? It seems unnecessarily cruel to deny children access to good instruction in this valuable skill.


Linda Siegel, PhD

Professor Emerita, University of British Columbia
Post Reply