Wales: Fears for 26,000 11-year-olds 'unable to read properly'

News articles, interviews, research, events and lots more - ready for your comments.
Post Reply
User avatar
Debbie_Hepplewhite
Posts: 2500
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 4:42 pm

Wales: Fears for 26,000 11-year-olds 'unable to read properly'

Post by Debbie_Hepplewhite »

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-35625843
About 26,000 children are at risk of leaving Welsh primary schools unable to read well over the next five years, a campaign group has claimed.

The Read On. Get On. coalition said "decisive action" must be taken by which ever party triumphs in May's assembly elections.

It claimed 10,000 of these children would be from poor backgrounds and must be allowed to fulfil their potential.

The Welsh government said literacy would be central to a new curriculum.
My suspicion is that in Wales there is an insufficient grasp of the findings of international research - in particular of the need for the systematic synthetic phonics teaching principles to be taken really seriously.

I worry that in Welsh medium schools, insufficient time and attention is given to the English language and spelling system.

In addition, Wales embraced fully progressive early years education with a play-based approach up to the age of 7.
User avatar
Susan Godsland
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 1:32 pm

Re: Wales: Fears for 26,000 11-year-olds 'unable to read properly'

Post by Susan Godsland »

These past threads re. the curriculum and teaching of reading in Wales, from the RRF message board, can help explain the problem:

http://www.rrf.org.uk/messageforum/view ... f=1&t=5777

http://www.rrf.org.uk/messageforum/view ... f=1&t=5598

http://www.rrf.org.uk/messageforum/view ... f=1&t=5313
User avatar
Debbie_Hepplewhite
Posts: 2500
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 4:42 pm

Re: Wales: Fears for 26,000 11-year-olds 'unable to read properly'

Post by Debbie_Hepplewhite »

Many thanks for those links, Susan.

I really want to highlight John Walker's postings which one of the RRF links above leads to. The reason is because John points out that when standardised tests are replaced by teacher assessments, this becomes a recipe for disaster on many levels. Standardised tests are designed to be objective - or as far as that is practicable - and teacher assessments are subjective, and then attempts must be made to 'moderate' those assessments which is costly in time and emotions!

There is of course every need for teacher assessment and this is an ongoing and necessary feature of good teaching provision. It is a 'within school' or 'within class' requirement. It informs the teacher per learner as 'formative assessment'.

Without national, annual objective testing, however, we cannot get a picture of literacy or numeracy standards overall, or from one year to the next, or indeed from one region to the next or from one country to the next. Objective national testing and standardised testing are 'markers' as to the bigger picture.

See what John Walker has to say about the situation regarding assessment in Wales:

http://literacyblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012 ... -last.html

http://literacyblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012 ... ghton.html

http://literacyblog.blogspot.co.uk/2011 ... s-too.html
Post Reply