Willingham & Lovette: Can Reading Comprehension Be Taught?

This is the hub of the site and the place to post queries, start discussions and join in the conversation!
Post Reply
User avatar
Debbie_Hepplewhite
Posts: 2500
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 4:42 pm

Willingham & Lovette: Can Reading Comprehension Be Taught?

Post by Debbie_Hepplewhite »

http://www.danielwillingham.com/uploads ... aught_.pdf
Can Reading Comprehension Be Taught?

by Daniel T. Willingham & Gail Lovette

In this commentary we suggest that reading comprehension strategy instruction does not actually improve general‐purpose comprehension skills. Rather, this strategy represents a bag of tricks that are useful and worth teaching, but that that are quickly learned and require minimal practice.

The funny thing about reading comprehension strategy instruction is that it really shouldn’t work, but it does. This commentary seeks to provide insight into how it should work and guidance on effective strategies for implementation.

Consider some common reasons why a student who decodes well might fail to understand what he reads. The student (a) doesn’t know the meaning of some words; (b) doesn’t notice that he does not comprehend the text; or (c) fails to make inferences. The importance of vocabulary is easy to appreciate; we can see why it’s helpful to notice if you do not understand what you are reading. The importance of inferences may be less obvious.
Teachers College Record, Date Published: September 26, 2014 http://www.tcrecord.org.proxy.its.virginia.edu ID Number: 17701
Dick Schutz

Re: Willingham & Lovette: Can Reading Comprehension Be Taught?

Post by Dick Schutz »

See also an article that provides historical context and reaches the same conclusion:

Misunderstanding 'Reading Comprehension': Implications for Instruction and Testing

https://ssrn.com/abstract=1531314
Post Reply