Page 3 of 3

Re: 2014 Reading Recovery study- can we believe the results?

Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2017 11:51 am
by Debbie_Hepplewhite
Meanwhile, it looks like Reading Recovery is to be returned to Worland, North Wyoming:

http://www.iferi.org/iferi_forum/viewto ... 1534#p1534

Re: 2014 Reading Recovery study- can we believe the results?

Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2017 12:03 pm
by Debbie_Hepplewhite
Professor Pamela Snow challenges the continuation of Reading Recovery:

Reading Recovery and Cassandra's Curse
http://pamelasnow.blogspot.co.uk/2014/0 ... curse.html

Re: 2014 Reading Recovery study- can we believe the results?

Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:04 am
by Debbie_Hepplewhite
I'm linking this thread to a later thread that flags up a 2017 paper critiquing the i3 Scale Up Study of Reading Recovery:

http://www.iferi.org/iferi_forum/viewto ... =861#p1606
The Reading Wars and Reading Recovery: What Educators, Families, and Taxpayers Should Know

Pamela Cook
Deborah R. Rodes
Kay L. Lipsitz
If advocates for Reading Recovery cannot accept the overwhelming scientific evidence regarding the need for strong foundational components of early reading instruction and evidence-based training of teachers in these skills, appropriate student and program evaluation measures, sustainable positive long-term outcomes and reasonable costs, then we, as educators, parents of children with reading disabilities, and taxpayers, strongly recommend that schools do not adopt the Reading Recovery program.