Aus: NSW government ditches 30-year-old $55m a year program - Reading Recovery!

News articles, interviews, research, events and lots more - ready for your comments.
Post Reply
User avatar
Debbie_Hepplewhite
Posts: 2500
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 4:42 pm

Aus: NSW government ditches 30-year-old $55m a year program - Reading Recovery!

Post by Debbie_Hepplewhite »

This is fantastic news in the 'Sydney Morning Herald' and long-awaited for by campaigners Kevin Wheldall, Jennifer Buckingham and many others. At last!

http://www.smh.com.au/national/educatio ... rkv1n.html
Reading Recovery: NSW government ditches 30-year-old, $55m a year program

The NSW government has abandoned a $55-million-a-year program that teaches students to read, 10 months after a damning review found the program that has been used in up to 960 schools for more than 30 years does not work.

The move, buried within the state government's $340 million Literacy and Numeracy Strategy announced on Wednesday, will see Reading Recovery lose its mandated status while the NSW government pushes ahead with a heightened testing regime from the first day of kindergarten to ensure struggling children are not left behind.
The program is a privately run proprietary program - only teachers who have paid for training are permitted to teach it. The initiative was developed in New Zealand during the 1970s to help struggling year 1 students with daily 30-minute lessons from a specially trained teacher and has now spread to the US, UK, Canada and Australia.

In March last year, Dr Moats told Victorian education leaders that it was "indefensible" to spend money on the program.
"The whole approach is based on ideas that have not held up to scientific scrutiny," Dr Moats said.

The NSW government's report, released on Wednesday, found widely used interventions are not always the most effective.
Education research fellow at The Centre for Independent Studies, Jennifer Buckingham, said the move to dump dedicated funding for Reading Recovery was long overdue.

"It is excellent that funding allocated solely to the program is going to be freed up so schools can use it for other more effective reading interventions," she said.
User avatar
Debbie_Hepplewhite
Posts: 2500
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 4:42 pm

Re: Aus: NSW government ditches 30-year-old $55m a year program - Reading Recovery!

Post by Debbie_Hepplewhite »

Professor Kevin Wheldall said about this long-awaited news:
I’ve been campaigning for this for over 20 years since our evaluation of RR for the Department in the early 90s found that it was effective for only 1 in 3; one recovered; one did not; and one would have recovered without RR (control group). Moreover the ones who recovered were those least in need. But it was the Department’s own research report, released just before last Christmas ... that put the final nail in the RR coffin.
And, further good news...it announces in the report:
...commenced an evaluation of L3, a Kindergarten to Year 2 literacy intervention that aims to reduce the risk of students not achieving expected literacy levels.
...commissioned a randomised control trial of MiniLit, a program developed by Macquarie University to support a phonics-based approach to reading instruction.
User avatar
Debbie_Hepplewhite
Posts: 2500
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 4:42 pm

Re: Aus: NSW government ditches 30-year-old $55m a year program - Reading Recovery!

Post by Debbie_Hepplewhite »

Jennifer Buckingham writes about the political awakening of Reading Recovery efficacy in 'The Spectator':
RIP Reading Recovery

Jennifer Buckingham
http://spectator.com.au/2016/09/rip-reading-recovery/
Thanks to NSW Education Minister Adrian Piccoli, the deeply entrenched, multi-million dollar Reading Recovery program will no longer be sacrosanct in NSW public schools. As of next year, the funding allocated to Reading Recovery will be unlocked and schools will be able to use this money for other more effective intervention programs to help students with reading difficulties.

This decision has been a long time coming. The NSW Department of Education was given strong advice 20 years ago by Professor Kevin Wheldall that Reading Recovery does not work very well. His report was swept under the carpet but, in recent years, evidence against Reading Recovery has become impossible to ignore.

A large study published by the NSW government’s own evaluation centre found that students who had been in the Reading Recovery program were less likely to be at the expected reading level at the end of Year 1 than matched students who had not done Reading Recovery. The same study found that Year 3 NAPLAN scores of Reading Recovery students were worse than non-Reading Recovery students. Similar results have been found in the US, UK and New Zealand.

Credit is due to Minister Piccoli, who no doubt met a lot of resistance from Reading Recovery devotees. Sadly, thousands of children have been poorly served by Reading Recovery over the last two decades, and many Catholic schools remain committed to the program. Hopefully, they too will soon see the light.

Dr Jennifer Buckingham is a Senior Research Fellow and Director of the FIVE from FIVE reading project at The Centre for Independent Studies
Sadly, Reading Recovery is a massively entrenched, massively expensive programme - institutionalised across the world. In England, for example, it is established in the Institute of Education. Recently, a visiting professor to the Institute of Education was shocked to see RR promoted heavily on the walls, 'how can this be, post Rose?' was the question raised.

Yes - how can this be?
User avatar
Debbie_Hepplewhite
Posts: 2500
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 4:42 pm

Re: Aus: NSW government ditches 30-year-old $55m a year program - Reading Recovery!

Post by Debbie_Hepplewhite »

Are the Catholic schools defending the indefensible?

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/reading-recov ... lukxu.html

This article pre-dates the latest development of withdrawal of funding from Reading Recovery:
Reading recovery: Catholics launch defence of $55 million a year program
Any programme teaching or promoting multi-cueing 'guessing words' strategies risks damaging at least some children's long term reading profiles.

See IFERI's 'What science and experience tell us about reading instruction:

http://www.iferi.org/what-science-and-e ... struction/
Post Reply